Scherwin skrev: ↑mandag, 09. aug, 2021 19:45
Hr. Drejer skrev: ↑mandag, 09. aug, 2021 19:29
Scherwin skrev: ↑mandag, 09. aug, 2021 18:47
United har bare rigtige store sponsor aftaler og de har ikke hentet "vanvittigt ind de sidste 5 års tid.
Jeg mener jeg så en liste, hvor Man U var dem med det største net spend over de sidste 5-7 år. Jeg er ikke helt sikker på hvor mange år det var over.
kan godt være det er lidt højere end jeg forventer, de har hentet harry maguire, fernandes and fred for store penge, men det er vel egentlig det? de har vel solgt lukaku for mere end de købte ham for eller lige over. tror jeg. kan være deres squad players som vi ikke regner for noget også koster knaster.
uanset hvad så må vi desværre indse at united bare tjener flere penge end vi gør, spørgsmålet er så hvor meget mere de kan holde "til" før det begynder at gøre ondt. deres ejere virker hellere ikke som nogle de bare vil punge ud.
Men i bund og grund så er Liverpools økonomi offentlig basicly lige som alle andre virksomheder. og vi er meget meget løn tunge i klubben i forhold til hvad vi tjener.
Så vi må bare tjene noget mere eller få en ejer som vil spøtte penge i klubben istedet for at være "selfsutainable"
Let’s take a look at the table (de sidste 5 år)
1. Manchester United | Net spend: £-457.60m
2. Manchester City | Net spend: £-357.31m
3. Aston Villa | Net spend: £-247.86m
4. Arsenal | Net spend: £-238.68m
5. Everton | Net spend: £-233.92m
6. Brighton | Net spend: £-212.35m
7. Chelsea | Net spend: £-209.15m
8. Wolves | Net spend: £-196.87m
9. Tottenham | Net spend: £-173.30m
10. Liverpool | Net spend: £-164.71m
11. West Ham | Net spend: £-132.28m
12. Leicester | Net spend: £-114.36m
13. Leeds | Net spend: £-106.39m
14. Newcastle | Net spend: £-98.97m
15. Crystal Palace | Net spend: £-55.99m
16. Southampton | Net spend: £-37.80m
17. Burnley | Net spend: £-22.09m
18. Watford | Net spend: £-14.10m
19. Brentford | Net spend: £+59.42m
20. Norwich | Net spend: £+66.17m
Let’s start with Man United. Their net spend is more than £100m of Manchester City, who find themselves in second place. And that’s without the unconfirmed signing of Varane included. However, Pep Guardiola’s side could leapfrog their rivals if they manage to sign both Harry Kane and Jack Grealish this summer.
Speaking of which, Aston Villa are, perhaps surprisingly, in third place. They will tumble if they sell Grealish to City in the coming weeks.
Arsenal are, obviously, in fourth suggesting they have underachieved in recent years. More underperformers follow with Brighton in fifth and Everton in sixth having very little joy with their relatively large net spend.
Champions of Europe, Chelsea, are seventh in the list. Not down to their lack of spending but more their ability to offload players for hefty fees.
Chelsea win the Champions League
Both Wolves and Tottenham are above Jurgen Klopp’s Liverpool. The Reds have a net spend of just £164.71m showing that the German manager is performing miracles at Anfield, winning both the Champions League and Premier League. This is largely down to selling Philippe Coutinho and earning sizeable fees for fringe players.
Leicester also deserve credit with a net spend of £114.36m as they continue to cope with clubs plucking their very best players.
Newcastle will complain that Mike Ashley often refuses to put his hand in his pocket and they may have a point with a net spend of less than £100m in the last five years.
Meanwhile, Southampton have benefited by selling some of their stars - most notably to Liverpool - as they sit in 16th position in this table.
The three newly-promoted sides are in the bottom three. Watford have spent £14m of their own money while Brentford and Norwich have both made profit of more than £50m since 2017/18.
